The course uses UX design frameworks to provide useful user-centric view&method on (bicycle) infra. The original context of UX design lies in software and this shows in this course because applicability isn’t always strong. I would welcome if the course was more bold in asserting a translation to urban design context and to use some general usercriteria from the field (e.g. Gehl, Jacobs, CROW)
1 thought on “Useful method but conceptually a bit thin”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Hi Tomas, thank you for your feedback. I would be happy to hear more of your thoughts.